<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Video: President Obama Speech on National Security, Torture, Guantanamo &#8211; May 21</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allthatnatters.com/2009/05/21/video-president-obama-speech-on-national-security-torture-guantanamo-may-21/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allthatnatters.com/2009/05/21/video-president-obama-speech-on-national-security-torture-guantanamo-may-21/</link>
	<description>... a weblog of current events and constant comment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 05:08:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: FAIR Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; &#39;Self-Serving Propaganda&#39;? No Problem on NPR</title>
		<link>http://allthatnatters.com/2009/05/21/video-president-obama-speech-on-national-security-torture-guantanamo-may-21/comment-page-1/#comment-265</link>
		<dc:creator>FAIR Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; &#39;Self-Serving Propaganda&#39;? No Problem on NPR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 20:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allthatnatters.com/?p=1521#comment-265</guid>
		<description>[...] blogs about current president Barack Obama and former vice president Dick Cheney recently &quot;attacking the policies of the other administration and defending their own positions in speeches.&quot; Even [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] blogs about current president Barack Obama and former vice president Dick Cheney recently &#8220;attacking the policies of the other administration and defending their own positions in speeches.&#8221; Even [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: panamarick</title>
		<link>http://allthatnatters.com/2009/05/21/video-president-obama-speech-on-national-security-torture-guantanamo-may-21/comment-page-1/#comment-261</link>
		<dc:creator>panamarick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 12:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allthatnatters.com/?p=1521#comment-261</guid>
		<description>I think it is morally incumbent that we Americans risk it all for the sake of true justice. We can easily do that by abiding by this thought “better a hundred guilty men go free then one innocent man be judged guilty.”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it is morally incumbent that we Americans risk it all for the sake of true justice. We can easily do that by abiding by this thought “better a hundred guilty men go free then one innocent man be judged guilty.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: todd armstrong</title>
		<link>http://allthatnatters.com/2009/05/21/video-president-obama-speech-on-national-security-torture-guantanamo-may-21/comment-page-1/#comment-233</link>
		<dc:creator>todd armstrong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 07:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allthatnatters.com/?p=1521#comment-233</guid>
		<description>upholding the rule of law, supporting the constitution, closing guantanamo, banning torture, water boarding all good . . . however many agree that preventative detention is outside the law regardless of oversight. 

It makes sense that there is a type of detainee that can&#039;t be prosecuted but still poses a threat to america. Can&#039;t this be done w/in the confines of the Constitution? 

This will be a big debate and a lighting rod for those who oppose the president: strict constitutionalists and opposing partisans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>upholding the rule of law, supporting the constitution, closing guantanamo, banning torture, water boarding all good . . . however many agree that preventative detention is outside the law regardless of oversight. </p>
<p>It makes sense that there is a type of detainee that can&#8217;t be prosecuted but still poses a threat to america. Can&#8217;t this be done w/in the confines of the Constitution? </p>
<p>This will be a big debate and a lighting rod for those who oppose the president: strict constitutionalists and opposing partisans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
