<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>all that natters ... &#187; Clean Coal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allthatnatters.com/tag/clean-coal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allthatnatters.com</link>
	<description>... a weblog of current events and constant comment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 01:38:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>We Know Transparency When We See It &#8211; And When We Don&#8217;t</title>
		<link>http://allthatnatters.com/2009/06/21/we-know-transparency-when-we-see-it-and-when-we-dont/</link>
		<comments>http://allthatnatters.com/2009/06/21/we-know-transparency-when-we-see-it-and-when-we-dont/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 04:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Visconti</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transparency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allthatnatters.com/?p=1828</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michael Isikoff writes in Newsweek about an Obama Administration stance on revealing which bigwig execs visit the White House on business.  The problem is that Obama&#8217;s lack of transparency in responding to a FOIA request regarding coal company executives resembles the stonewalling secrecy of the Bush Administration&#8217;s handling of similar requests. As an Obama supporter [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.newsweek.com/id/202875" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.newsweek.com/id/202875?referer=');"><strong>Michael Isikoff writes in Newsweek</strong></a> about an Obama Administration stance on revealing which bigwig execs visit the White House on business.  The problem is that Obama&#8217;s lack of transparency in responding to a FOIA request regarding coal company executives resembles the stonewalling secrecy of the Bush Administration&#8217;s handling of similar requests.</p>
<p>As an Obama supporter and Obama voter I am equally elated and dismayed.  In the case of energy policy, I&#8217;m elated we have a President who seems to be finally making the connection between our dependence on oil &#8211; foreign and otherwise &#8211; and environmental and national security issues.  I&#8217;m dismayed by Obama&#8217;s refusal to honor public interest groups&#8217; requests to know what coal companies are lobbying the White House on &#8220;clean coal&#8221; initiatives.  The jury is out on the feasibility of clean coal technology and its practicality.  As an Ohioan I want to support the coal industry.  As an American concerned about pollution, greenhouse gases and the affordability of electricity I want to know more about where the federal government intends to invest clean coal funding and what to expect as a return on investment.  As a cynic, I want to know what big spenders &#8211; be they coal companies or the Sierra Club &#8211; are attempting to game the political system.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.addtoany.com/share_save?referer=');"><img src="http://allthatnatters.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://allthatnatters.com/2009/06/21/we-know-transparency-when-we-see-it-and-when-we-dont/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
